Will Patcham and Withdean lend their vote to the Greens?

This has been a long time coming, but I’ve only just had the chance to look at the breakdown from the Green/ICM poll for Brighton Pavilion.

Going through the breakdowns, I was surprised to see in Table 2 (the ward by ward breakdown), the voting intentions of constituents in the Patcham and Withdean wards.

The voting intentions in Patcham read:

Conservative- 26%
Labour- 14%
Lib Dem- 2%
Greens- 25%

This is a 13% swing towards the Greens from the 2007 City Council elections. However, 22% of respondents in Patcham, when asked whom they would vote for replied, ‘Don’t know.’ This creates what could be an interesting scenario in a solid Tory ward.

The breakdown in Withdean, another Tory stronghold, where the three councillors enjoy a majority of well over a thousand, reads:

Conservative- 19%
Labour- 16%
Lib Dem- 4%
Green- 23%

This is very atypical behaviour from voters who would not normally be considered Greens. Yet again, the ‘Don’t knows’ are remarkably high, 29% of correspondents said they did not know who they would vote for.

This is an opportunity for the Greens and a major threat to the Tories. If the Cameron message is not sticking in their strongholds, how does this really fare elsewhere across Pavilion?

It wouldn’t come as a surprise to learn that the Tories were least popular in Hanover and Elm Grove (only 9% of correspondents said they would be voting for the Conservatives), St. Peter’s and North Laine (10%) and Preston Park (16%).

Perhaps the most suprising figure to come from the poll was the Tories strong support in Hollingbury and Stamner where 34% of correspondents said they would be giving them their vote, only 19% said they would be backing Labour on polling day and 20% said ‘Don’t know.’

 The number of ‘Don’t knows’ in the poll was rather high, 19% of the total number of people asked said they did not know who to vote for, meaning that this election is far from over and, particularly in Patcham and Withdean, there is all to play for. If the Conservatives can’t get the vote out in their strong holds, it will become very difficult for them to push the vote in other wards in the constituency.

Whilst the margin of error for the poll is high, especially with a sample size of 533, it’s clear that the battle in Pavilion will be a straight fight between the Tories’ Charlotte Vere and the Greens’ Caroline Lucas. If the Greens can draw a line in Withdean (and I certainly believe there is every chance that the Greens can poll very highly in the ward), they will force the Tory campaign to concentrate more of their efforts (and far more of their resources) trying to shore up their vote.

But this is a General Election and parties need to get every vote they can, regardless of where it is. The Greens greatest strength in Withdean and Patcham is the fact they’re not Labour. The Greens need to cultivate that potential, to target swing voters in  parts of those wards (the roads and streets most likely to nod in tune with the Green message) and to convince the ‘Don’t knows’ to look at the math, to be bold and to commit.


1 Response so far »

  1. 1

    Adam Ramsay said,

    Presumably it’s a weighted poll, so the margin of error on the constituency-wide figures doesn’t have to be huge, but the figures on the wards will presumably, have a significant margin – we are looking at 80 people in Patcham and 86 in Withdean…

    However, given that, this is interesting. There is, of course, another way of reading this – that those wards show that the Tory vote is under-represented in the poll. However, ICM don’t tend to get things that wrong, and the fact that we see the same in both wards makes this unlikely, I think.

    Something that is interesting in these figures is the socio-economic breakdown. Both Greens & Labour are doing best among AB’s (on 31% to 21%). Tories do best among C2’s. In a way, this encourages me. The C2’s are voting directly against their interests – for a party who will screw them. If they can be convinced of this, a Green victory should be safe.

Comment RSS · TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: